In critiquing Toto Wolff’s decision regarding the car concept in Bahrain, the speaker on the Sky Sports podcast acknowledged a key reservation. The focal point of criticism was Wolff’s eagerness to publicly disown the chosen concept, particularly following the Bahrain qualifying session.
The commentator raised uncertainty about the rationale behind Wolff’s approval of what Lewis Hamilton had dubbed the ‘sister of the bad car,’ referring to the W14 as the sibling of the W13, both deemed subpar in performance. Despite the unfavorable characteristics, the speaker acknowledged that Toto Wolff, as the team leader, had authorized the concept. The commentator suggested that, given his position, Wolff could have exercised leadership by expressing disagreement and opting for the Red Bull concept. However, for reasons unknown, this course of action was not pursued.
The crux of the matter lies in Wolff’s subsequent public statements post-qualifying. Recalling the interview vividly, the commentator expressed surprise at the strength of Wolff’s condemnation of the car. Wolff had characterized the vehicle as weak and bad immediately after the qualifying session, following the inaugural race of the season.
While the commentator conceded that Wolff’s assessment might have been accurate, the abrupt dismissal of the entire concept after such a brief period raised eyebrows. The speaker acknowledged that although Wolff’s critique aligned with the performance issues observed, the unexpected and forceful rejection of the concept contradicted the typical calm and assured leadership style attributed to Toto Wolff.
In essence, the speaker questioned the coherence of Wolff’s leadership approach in this instance, emphasizing the contrast between approving the concept and subsequently publicly denouncing it. The critique suggested that this departure from the expected composed demeanor might indicate a lapse in the typically assured leadership that Toto Wolff has been known for.
Leave a Reply